2001 Lance Armstrong Nike ad.
1 Comment so far
Leave a comment
January 23, 2013, 1:53 pm
Filed under: advertising, creativity, cycling | Tags: amp, armstrong, cortisone, Drug abuse, EPO, fallacy, Lance Armstrong, Lance armstrong TV ad, legacy, nike, steroids
Filed under: advertising, creativity, cycling | Tags: amp, armstrong, cortisone, Drug abuse, EPO, fallacy, Lance Armstrong, Lance armstrong TV ad, legacy, nike, steroids
“What am I on? I’m on my bike, that’s what I’m on.”
(And I’m off my face on Cortisone, steroids, EPO and stuff.)
This further adds to the Armstrong fallacy. It used to be a legacy.
1 Comment so far
Leave a comment
I respect armstrong. I’ve tried to ride a bike whilst on drugs. Really tricky.
Comment by James January 27, 2013 @ 11:15 pm