Son of Saul: film Review


sonofsaul.jpg

This movie is not taken on lightly as an audience member.

To classify it as ‘entertainment’ would certainly be wrong because the subject matter is so uncompromisingly challenging.

I wanted to love it unreservedly for the bravery of its content but I’m afraid I was left a little cold.

The film is shot in square format (possibly 4:3) which is immediately disarming and unusual (the last time I saw this was in the veery different Wes Anderson’s Grand Budapest Hotel) and it’s used effectively because it gives the viewer a voyeuristic look into the mayhem that is Dachau where the movie is set.  It also helps the director from a budgetary point of view because it eschews the need for expensive wide shots.

The opening scenes are astonishingly harrowing as we see the “pieces” of Jewish bodies essentially processed through the factory of death with disturbing, off screen, dog barks, German soldier orders and mechanical noise.  It’s brutal and affecting in the extreme.

In some ways this is what I grotesquely wanted from the movie.  I wanted to be horrified like no horror movie could achieve.

Forgive me for this but it didn’t happen.  Yes, the mood was grotesque thanks, in particular, to the extrordinary sound design, but on screen I felt it shirked its potential too much.

In the end this voyeurtistic cinematography ultimately becomes both tiresome and limiting.

The fundamental weakness of the movie, in my opinion, is in the storyline.  Frankly it’s not that credible and doesn’t stack up.  The main protagonist (Saul) discovers his (illegitimate?) son as a gas chamber survivor and smuggles him out of the situation to seek a Rabbi to give him a proper Jewish burial.

This leads to a sequernce of events that side stories with an undercover camp breakout in which he is also inexplicably involved.

Sorry, it’s not credible.

And Géza Röhrig as the lead didn’t really do it for me.

And so the early wonderment of the movie, it really is very moving, starts to erode and gradually descends into incredibility.

I love what this movie stands for.  I respect every iota of it.

I just didn’t think it was particularly good overall.

2 thoughts on “Son of Saul: film Review

  1. Still debating whether to go and see this for a host of reasons – not least do I really want to expose myself to it? (even for all the good reasons). Also been a lot written about holocaust portrayals in movies because of this one. One thing thing caught me about your review – ‘tiresome and limiting’. But, perhaps, maybe this is not a bad thing. I was always struck with the description of Eichmann as representing the ‘banality of evil’ (Leonard Cohen referencing somebody else I think). Maybe this film will expand on that in the way it’s shot. Maybe not. I guess I won’t find out unless I go see it. But still not sure if I will.

    Like

Come on folks. Don't just sit there gawping. Say something. Get involved.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s